>>I really think the Dutch progressive approach has more to do with prostitution and the spreading of disease then sex slavery and/or rape.
>
>Spreading of disease ? Please explain...

Somehow it seems hard to imagine that the sex workers would, for the tax they pay, be included in the health system and have regular checks, which would, I guess, include frequent checks against occupational hazards.

>>I'm all for the Dutch progressive approach. Get it licensed, taxed, and monitored.
>
>Who gets the tax revenue? :)

The Fed, of course :).