I think I read somewhere that the tower gets hit about 75 times a year. Who says lightning doesn't strike twice. Oh, wait... 75 times isn't twice. I forgot.

>Nice :o)
>
>>The CN Tower gets some nice shots here.
>>
>>http://2pat.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/cn_tower_-_lightning.jpg
>>
>>
>>>>>>We've had more than our usual share of lightning storms here in Vancouver this summer. Here's a good shot of a strike captured by one of the best webcams in the city:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>http://katkam.ca/large.aspx?f=20090903024500.jpg
>>>>>
>>>>>Very cool! Scary, but cool :o)
>>>>>
>>>>>For you enjoyment - more:
>>>>>http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/07/lightning.html
>>>>
>>>>There are some good shots of cloud-to-cloud lightning there. I can't recall ever seeing any in person until our big storm of July 25.
>>>>
>>>>I think #18 looks totally fake. And #3 (behind a nuke plant) and #4 (behind a couple of F-18s) - how convenient is that? ;)
>>>
>>>Really, I cannot verify any. Although every picture has a byline. Behind the F-18s is very convenient if you are stationed on the USS John C. Stennis :o) Behind the nuke plant as well - we have a nuke plant here (shearon harris nuclear plant) and we have many lightning strikes every year. When I was stationed in Schweinfurt, Germany, I took lots of photos of the nuclear power plant there. Anyone on duty on the tarmac during a storm could take similar photos at any military airbase. Perhaps you could write to Mass Communication 2nd Class Elliott Fabrizio/U.S. Navy and ask him whether he doctored the photo or not :o)
>>>
>>>According to these:
>>>
>>>http://rturner229.blogspot.com/2009/06/hacker-photo-picked-up-by-ap-wall.html
>>>http://www.crh.noaa.gov/sgf/Safety/summer_safety.php
>>>
>>>#18 is most likely legit. He's a photographer for the Carthage Press.
>>>
>>>I've seen a lot of lightning strike photos in the past though that were fake.