>>>>>>But this is EB 3.0! Isn't version 3 the one where MS supposedly "gets it right". So much for that streak.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>I think that streak ended with VFP 3.0 <g>
>>>>
>>>>How many of y'all remember how buggy vfp3.0 was. It was horrendous...
>>>
>>>I don't. I delivered my first VFP application build with 3.0 and it is still working (it is updated to VF6,7 and 9 but not because of any bugs I remember. ( I don't know what horrendous means but sounded like horror, I would disagree. VFP3 was good enough its class at that time ).
>>>Cetin
>>
>>VFP 3.0 did have some problems in my opinion but was a welcome upgrade from the 2.6? ( think that was the last version before oop). Took me quite awhile to understand why I had to deal with "Read Events" and be limited to I think it was 5 or something. I had just switched to fox in that 2.x version and thought I went a hundred miles backwards in functionality. I was quite thankful for 3.0 in spite of it's problems. Oh, I sure don't want to go back to those days. We have it really good now with VS and Dot Net.
>>Tim
>
>Yes it may have problems but I don't know any developer tool that doesn't have any. I am saying it was not something that deserved to be called horrendous (looked up the meaning:) Yes any foxpro developer at that time should be thankful. VS 1.x was no better after many many years later.
>Cetin

Yes Cetin, I agree with you.
Tim