Hiya Bruce ---
>>Thats great, but is it something we can tap into, or should we be prepared to develop using that as our data source? Just curious.
>
>We've been hearing about this too. Some questions:
>
>1) Someone said it still requires SQL Server on a server to function. Anyone know about this?
Nope. There will be a desktop, embedded version that will work locally or standalone.
>
>2) How would this work with vfp? There doesn't seem any point to replacing local machine vfp data with a more complex interface...
>
You could use SQL-Server as a local data store with ADO or through a database connection SPT or remote view.
>3) Also, what might the cost be, is it anything similar to the server version per-user license? Or would this come standard with Office-Prof., maybe?
I dunno but I expect relatively cheap.
------------------------------------------------
John Koziol, ex-MVP, ex-MS, ex-FoxTeam. Just call me "X"
"When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro" - Hunter Thompson (Gonzo) RIP 2/19/05