>>>>>>>It's unconstitutional to execute someone who's insane.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Where does it say that?
>>>>>
>>>>>In 1986 the US Supreme Court held that the execution of insane people was barred by the Eighth Amendment, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>What difference does being insane make re: the Eigth Amendment.
>>>>
>>>>Not that I really care. Justice doesn't go hand in hand with the Supremes. Drop them off here and justice will be done.
>>>
>>>
>>>As Justice Thurgood Marshall put it.... the Constitution protects "the dignity of society ... from the barbarity of mindless vengeance,"
>>>Thus an execution can only be carried on on those who can understand why the state is killing them.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>"the Constitution protects "the dignity of society ... from the barbarity of mindless vengeance,"
>>
>>My dogs will recycle the parts. Society would be protected from the barbarity of their mindless vengeance
>
>Interesting that you think feeing a human to dogs would actually somehow benefit humanity by shielding us from barbarity. Surely you understand just how ridiculous that is.

I didn't say anything about feeding a human to dogs. I'm talking about the creatures that killed the mother and tried to kill the girl. They do not count as anything except a threat to society to me.

>
>
>>>>>>>>http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,581997,00.html?test=latestnews
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Or the body parts, anyway.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Or we can let Tamar rehabilitate them.