OK. The place I was working in Baton Rouge was a pretty serious SQL Server shop and their DBAs specifically forbade sp_ prefixes. And they were potentates -- nothing went into production without their approval.
I know some folks here are not working at the moment. Anyone who happens to be in that predicament is encouraged to talk to Amedisys. The last I heard they only had funding for contractors through the end of last year. I don't know if that has changed. They had a bunch of us last year. Their line of work is home health care and hospice care, and business is booming. Baton Rouge is a great place and the people are terrific. Of all the places I have worked they are one of the two who approach software development most rigorously. I think Amedisys may have gained an incorrect bad reputation here due to one prominent UT member who was turned down. Their hiring process is rigorous and being a team player is crucial. If you are interested, contact Nicolle Psilos of TEKSystems in New Orleans.
>I think it originally did, but many people started using sp_ against recommendations, so they started to be called system procedures.
>
>>I have always understood the sp_ to stand for stored procedure.
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only