The things I have tried to convey are basic tenets of logic and science

So when you were trying to bamboozle people into thinking that auto-spanning was imminent because a certain well-respected VFP stalwart was a high-level executive, was that logic or science? <s>

Given you never acknowledged your factual error (instead of defensive posturing), do you think you're on solid ground for lectures on "logic and science"?

You know as well as I do that there will never be a "study" or "poll". You also know I'm right.

I'm done.