>Yes, it was real sloppy by the scientists who did it.
>
>Mike, if you think it was merely being sloppy, I think there's a great deal more you need to read. This was intellectual corruption. Care to hear some facts?
I am not disputing the facts of what happened there. Wanting a particular conclusion, of course, is the opposite of proper scientific method. That doesn't mean the conclusion is wrong.
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only
