Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Didn't Obama promise . . . .
Message
From
15/03/2010 17:29:36
 
General information
Forum:
Politics
Category:
Other
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01454459
Message ID:
01454678
Views:
50
>>>>Didn't Obama promise to hike taxes on businesses that out sourced jobs in order to have the jobs come back to the USA? What happened to that?
>>>
>>>That was classified as too 'socialistic'. The powers want 'unregulated capitalism' and so do wan't many reps up here. So what are they complaining about ??
>>>
>>>Anyways. he fights an uphill battle.
>>
>>In case you've forgottenm, it's the left (American political left) who have the power and they can't agree on anything. They are more devisive and splintered than ever. That party has had more opportunity to make changes than in recent history and failed to do so. They have broken many of their promises (like the work hours, the pay, the tax cuts for the middle class, the ethics, the posting of bills in advance of voting, the removal of tax breaks for corporations that move jobs overseas, etc. The powers do NOT want "unregulated capitalism" at all. They just cannot agree on what specific regulation and control they do want. There is too much internal bickering and that is the "progressive left." The right is even worse but they don't have any power to get anything done so it's moot. They will not take away individual freedom so close to an election year. It is suicide in the polls to do so. You yourself stated you have groups of 'voting cattle' in your country and yet you continue to make blanket statements about Americans. If you want to make idiotic statements like that then back them up with facts. Please support your statement:
>>
>>The powers want 'unregulated capitalism' and so do wan't many reps up here
>
>I'm not sure the lack of progress is due so much to splintering among Democrats as steadfast opposition to everything by Republicans. Obama could issue a proclamation that the sun rises in the east and they would oppose it.
>
>There's my "no political talk" mulligan, going back underground ;-)

It wouldn't matter. When the house had the supermajority they could have passed anything they wanted that didn't go against the constitution and bill of rights, but they couldn't do it. That had nothing to do with the Republicans but only the inability of the dems to come to a consensus among themselves. The Republicans could rant until the cows come home but they didn't have the votes to stop a bill passing if the Dems wanted it to happen. This is entirely on the Dems. I'm dissappointed in them. Heck, I've been disappointed in both for so long it's hard to tell which side is worse!
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*

010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform