>I can see why you think that, but you really don't know. So, you'll have to evaluate and eat the additional cost if you get it.
>
>MS is trying for a release every 18 months or so. That puts it the end of 2011, so my guess is they'll call it 2012.

It would be nice if they worried about making a release not buggy rather than just tossing out another new, unfinished, buggy product with cool sounding stuff in it.

>
>
>>I know, as Mike correctly pointed, we look at things differently. I bought VS 2005 about 5 years ago and was pretty happy with it. I skipped VS 2008, didn't see much need for it. Now, I believe that I can use VS 2010 but probably won't need VS 2011, VS2012, VS2013 <g> So I will wait for VS 2015.