>>>This gets more and more disturbing
>>>
>>>http://www.philly.com/philly/news/homepage/20100416_1_000s_of_Web_cam_images__suit_says.html
>>
>>No kidding.
>>
>>"The district has said it turned on the camera in Robbins' computer because his family had not paid the $55 insurance fee and he was not authorized to take the laptop home."
>>
>>Is that really the position the SD is going to take? They're totally OTL.
>
>Yeah - and 400+ pictures - some when the kid was 1/2 dressed or asleep too. The article said that once the program was turned on it took a pic every 15 minutes....well if there are 400+ pictures they sure as hell left it turned on quite a bit didn't they? I agree with you - their position and argument over the $55 insurance fee is ..ummm...STUPID. Carol Cafiero, the administrator running the program - is a sick twisted person.

Now she's hiding behind the 5th Amendment: http://www.philly.com/dailynews/local/20100410_Key_figure_in__Webcamgate__invokes_Fifth.html