>>Here's a cheery thought for 2013
>>
>>When did that Mayan calendar predict things going pear shaped.
>>
>>
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/space/7819201/Nasa-warns-solar-flares-from-huge-space-storm-will-cause-devastation.html>
>WTF? Why should the solar maximum, which seems to be estimated for 2013 according to that article, be any worse than other maxima that appear roughly every 11 years? No reasons are mentioned in the article, and it might just be so much sensationalism.
I don't get how that article measures up to this one:
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2009/29may_noaaprediction/Heck, something's going to happen Dec 21, 2012 - if it's not aliens, earthquakes and volcanic eruptions from the polar shift, or a nuclear blast, it will be solar flares
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"
