That's interesting, because in general VFP6 seems lighter and less of a resource hog than 5.0. I've got a developer on staff who does work at home on a P90 and gets "acceptable" performance there.

I'd be interested in learning a little about her app to see if the things that are slower could be isolated.

P.S. VFP5 wasn't so hot on slow machines either, as I'm sure you know...

Eric Shaneson
Cutting Edge Consulting

>I don't disagree with you, Eric. Ellen Whitney recently posted a message that a 5.0 app she upgraded to 6.0 works just perfectly on her 2xx (?) MHz machine, but on her client's 133 it is very sluggish. Even tabbing from one control to the next.
>
>So, it's a concern. But it may be something else altogether. But, IAC, the client's unhappy, so it's back to 5.0 for now. Do you have any thoughts on the matter?
>
>>I've ben using VFP6 since the pre-release at DevCon. I have yet to find an ...snip