>Your bar-room analogy is proof that this debate is likely pointless.
>
>My question to you was why you chose to condemn the United States for the war against Islamic terrorism, but you've never condemned your own country for expanding attacks on Germany (to cities like Mannheim) that surely resulted in killing innocent German citizens and children. It is a rhetorical question that illustrates the complexity of fighting an enemy that is not associated with a specific nation-state...as well as a question that demonstrates your inconsistency...but I was still curious to hear your answer.

Because bombing the enemy in war was an effective tool. The US was on terror is misjudged, badly aimed, using vast resources and ineffective. Is the world a safer place than it was. Short answer . No

The war on terror is a propaganda sop to the intellectually challenged who watch,listen to and read Fox news and believe it. Who think that complex problems are made better by randomly shooting and blowing up things.