On an XP machine with 2 cpus I got a before of 25 seconds and an after of 5 seconds.
>It's my understanding that there's no parallel execution of the code in ParallelFox because you have only 1 extra CPU = 1 Worker but extra expenses for launching the worker and executing the code through COM.
>
>>OK. So now that you know I have "2", does that give you enough information to answer my initial question - why does the "after" code run slower than the "before" code for those two examples?
>>
>>
>>
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only