>I thought the announcement of the meeting was really, really badly written. It's as simple as that. I could have kept my mouth shut, which probably would have been the wiser move, Things have been bearing down on me lately like bricks and maybe I took it out on that message. People who think they are so darned smart don't always write well. And I thought that was one of the points of going to college.
>
>I see. Now it's perfectly clear. Here's a summary:
>
>1) You thought it was badly written. Not just badly written, but REALLY REALLY badly written.
>
>2) When asked why, you state that things are bearing down and you took out your frustration on it. You re-assert it's as plain as day that the announcement is poorly written.
>
>3) People who are smart don't write well. The people who drafted the announcement are smart.
>
>4) Therefore, the announcement was badly written. Becuase, after all, the people who wrote it think they're smart.....
>
>Thanks for clearing that up.
>
>By the way, your motivations are quite clear.

I thought it was badly written. And I said that not knowing you were one of the co-authors. It was ungrammatical, trite, and full of empty words. I know you write better than that normally so we can just let this go. I suspect the main author was the other guy, who probably groks bits and bytes more than English words.

My motivations?