General information
Category:
Conferences & events
>>But that is a result of the lack of VFP's wide-spread acceptance (and no >database language will ever have as wide-spread acceptance as VB). If lack of >standardization is the reason why VFP isn't successful, it seems to me that >that would have applied to VB as well.
>
>I don't follow your logic here. Why do you feel that VFP's misfortune should also spell misfortune for VB?
What I was saying was that lack of standardization didn't prevent VB from squashing the competition, therefore I see no reason why lack of standardization would've prevented VFP from doing the same. In other words, there must be other factors (as I'm sure you agree).
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only