>> Why his fellow troops killed him in a way that sounds unaccidental, I don't know
>>
>>Unless you have proof that it wasn't an accident (even a horrible accident), that it baseless.
>
>No, of course I don't have proof. I was not there, and the military acted quickly to destroy evidence. This is not my theory, Kevin. There are many sites which say this is the case. It has been a long time since I decided not to pursue journalism as a career but I think I still have a sense of what's true and what isn't, regardless of provenance.

Mike

don't you think those theories are a little like who killed Kennedy. Its 99.9% probable that it was a friendy fire accident.