>>> Why his fellow troops killed him in a way that sounds unaccidental, I don't know
>>>
>>>Unless you have proof that it wasn't an accident (even a horrible accident), that it baseless.
>>
>>No, of course I don't have proof. I was not there, and the military acted quickly to destroy evidence. This is not my theory, Kevin. There are many sites which say this is the case. It has been a long time since I decided not to pursue journalism as a career but I think I still have a sense of what's true and what isn't, regardless of provenance.
>
>Mike
>
>don't you think those theories are a little like who killed Kennedy. Its 99.9% probable that it was a friendy fire accident.

I was going to question "which sites" were they respectable journalists or conspiracy blogs? Maybe we should all start writing our own opinion blogs which can then be included in references to support views for those who don't do any research themselves or bother with checking reliable journalists. What's worse is once reliable news sources are now quoting conspiracy blogs - not as fact, but always mentioning them in their stories to give them that extra little excitement and draw more hits....