>>> Why his fellow troops killed him in a way that sounds unaccidental, I don't know
>>>
>>>Unless you have proof that it wasn't an accident (even a horrible accident), that it baseless.
>>
>>No, of course I don't have proof. I was not there, and the military acted quickly to destroy evidence. This is not my theory, Kevin. There are many sites which say this is the case. It has been a long time since I decided not to pursue journalism as a career but I think I still have a sense of what's true and what isn't, regardless of provenance.
>
>Mike
>
>don't you think those theories are a little like who killed Kennedy. Its 99.9% probable that it was a friendy fire accident.

That is what I have always accepted since the original lie came out. Now I wonder. Any probabilities I might assign would be pulled out of my toolkit.

I get what you're saying about theories flying around the internet. This one somehow has the ring of truth.