Well, since Roy Halladay's numbers are much strong than Lincecum's, I thought I'd compare Lincecum to Philly's 2nd starter, Cole Hamels.

Lincecum has a better winning % than Hamels, though Hamels has had one of the lowest run support figures in MLB.

Their numbers are interesting...


Lincecum: 14- 9, ERA of 3.60, 30 starts, 208 Ks, 70 BBs, WHIP 1.30, opponent BA .247
Hamels: 11-10, ERA of 3.01, 30 starts, 201 Ks, 56 BBs, WHIP 1.16, opponent BA .233