Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Windows Mobile 7 - What No Built in Database
Message
De
28/10/2010 15:36:42
John Ryan
Captain-Cooker Appreciation Society
Taumata Whakatangi ..., Nouvelle Zélande
 
 
À
28/10/2010 10:52:07
Information générale
Forum:
ASP.NET
Catégorie:
Code, syntaxe and commandes
Divers
Thread ID:
01487280
Message ID:
01487421
Vues:
63
>>Have not looked into it, but this is probably just a security add on

Yes, it is. It's one reason why the "database" in Android isn't as accessible as it needs to be. Also the documentation is pitched at an advanced level in contrast with the wider exposure and accessibility that has been promoted over the past decade. We're in a time warp. ;-)

>>SqLite is on its way to become the esperanto for local access on many devices I had hoped dbf to stay...

Yep, it's all over the place. But so is dbf and since add-on tools are indicated whatever database you use, I wouldn't be surprised to see dbf as an option. Not that it matters as long as the manipulation and syncing tools are there.

>>Having no access to the filesystem (as mentioned in a test) in WM7 puts it even lower than the IPhone -
going after gamers might be workable that way, but that's not me.
I want an intelligent device I can search without a PC and perhaps even without internet and use for DOC's, PDF etc., a mobile datastore and perhaps some songs.

Sure enough. The reasons these devices are selling so well include geek enthusiasm, vendor fan-boyism and subsidies from phone providers. If these things weren't also phones with "wow" factor when you look at them (the WP is a good example, plenty of wow when you see those tiles move) they'd be much harder to shift IMHO.

>>Bring on Vfp>3: these babes have the power of machines at the very end of last century: Higher clocks but less detailed caches and instruction pipelines. Early Pentium/K6: can run NT or Unix...

Either would do, though something even more accessible like Access might be even better. It will happen: Google has been working for a while on new tools to allow anybody to create their own business apps, which definitely will need an accessible database with automated syncing. I said FP because it was created by a private company before MS bought it, so there is no reason why we shouldn't expect another small company to come up with another displacing technology. Especially since the major vendors seem determined to retrace their steps since 1990 wrt data on this new platform.
"... They ne'er cared for us
yet: suffer us to famish, and their store-houses
crammed with grain; make edicts for usury, to
support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act
established against the rich, and provide more
piercing statutes daily, to chain up and restrain
the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and
there's all the love they bear us.
"
-- Shakespeare: Coriolanus, Act 1, scene 1
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform