>Yeah well here's why we don't.
>
>I've already stated my reservations when there is any question as to guilt. That does not apply to the case I referenced - the killer is a total and complete monster and deserves punishment.

Yes you've stated that before - but obviously that's flawed logic - you think a jury sent these guys to death row questioning their guilt?

>
>And for any of the whiny mamby-pampies out there who carry the "cruel and unusual punishment"...of course it's cruel. It's vicious. It's barbaric. And it OUGHT to be. But one thing it is NOT, is unusual.
>
>Anyone who did to my kid what this monster did to the four year old, wouldn't even make it to trial. I'd gut him like a fish....and no jury would convict me.

Two wrongs don't make a right.