>>>>Also most security experts agree that airport searches are for public consumption and have nothing to do with effectively increasing security.
>>>>
>>>>And now we go from naivete to cynical mendacity.
>>>>
>>>>What security experts are those?? And precisely how would one "measure" that searches don't increase security?
>>>
>>>How would you measure that it does.
>>>
>>>And why are you accusing me of lying.
>>>
>>>You're implying that I know they increase security but for reasons of my own am denying it.
>>>
>>>Here's one http://www.cbc.ca/canada/british-columbia/story/2010/01/03/bc-airport-security-expert.html.
>>>
>>>You may not like Fox news but with your knee jerk populism you could certainly get a job with them.
>>
>>Yesterday I was thinking about terrorists switching to deliver explosives like drug mules. Lo and behold, it's in the works. Here's one expert:
>>
>>Expert: TSA scans would let al-Qaida duplicate 9/11
>>Brigitte Gabriel warns unless U.S. starts profiling, nation is vulnerable
>>http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=229613
>
>I think there already has been a bomb inside a bomber. I remember a case.He caused quite a lot of damage and injury but field to kill his target.

Prince Mohammed bin Nayef, Saudi assistant Interior Minister (some irony there <g>) was the intended target.

The explosive was probably inserted into the anus, but was not sufficient to kill the Prince.

To address that problem, it is said that al-Quaeda is now trying to recruit even bigger axxholes for this type of mission ...