>>>>>Also most security experts agree that airport searches are for public consumption and have nothing to do with effectively increasing security.
>>>>>
>>>>>And now we go from naivete to cynical mendacity.
>>>>>
>>>>>What security experts are those?? And precisely how would one "measure" that searches don't increase security?
>>>>
>>>>How would you measure that it does.
>>>>
>>>>And why are you accusing me of lying.
>>>>
>>>>You're implying that I know they increase security but for reasons of my own am denying it.
>>>>
>>>>Here's one http://www.cbc.ca/canada/british-columbia/story/2010/01/03/bc-airport-security-expert.html.
>>>>
>>>>You may not like Fox news but with your knee jerk populism you could certainly get a job with them.
>>>
>>>Yesterday I was thinking about terrorists switching to deliver explosives like drug mules. Lo and behold, it's in the works. Here's one expert:
>>>
>>>Expert: TSA scans would let al-Qaida duplicate 9/11
>>>Brigitte Gabriel warns unless U.S. starts profiling, nation is vulnerable
>>>http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=229613
>>
>>I think there already has been a bomb inside a bomber. I remember a case.He caused quite a lot of damage and injury but field to kill his target.
>
>Prince Mohammed bin Nayef, Saudi assistant Interior Minister (some irony there <g>) was the intended target.
>
>The explosive was probably inserted into the anus, but was not sufficient to kill the Prince.
>
>To address that problem, it is said that al-Quaeda is now trying to recruit even bigger axxholes for this type of mission ...

Thanks.My first LOL moment of the day.

Another reason to ban fatties from air travel. They could conceal more explosive.