>>>Uhm.. What a long response to a very simple question... {g}
>>>
>>>Well story is still unfolding. We will know all details in a few days I guess.
>>>Meanwhile it is nice to know that there are people in US who oppose 'SOA' (stands for 'School of Assasins') practices,
>>>and better yet that there are journalists still interested in reporting events like this. Even if it is only one International channel.
>>>
>>>I watched multiple videos on this event, and googled desperately on FoxNews / oRaily crew covering this event, but surprisingly did not find any! (Nor any other US media for that matter).
>>>
>>>How is that possible ? Are they already (God Forbid!) banned ? ;))
>>
>>Yeah, the New York Times hid it under
>>
>>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/22/us/politics/22protest.html
>>
>>Of course, the NYT is a samizdat and I'm sure this only got into the hands of a brave few who escaped from the jackbooted fascist government censors that control American media.
>
>Talking to a dinosaur...{g} Aloha Charles! Censorship nowadays is not what used to be in USSR back in 50ies...
>
>This article is almost off the textbook of modern media control;
>It reports on marginalization of mentioned protests rather then original cause for protests. Not that NYT would accept this,
>but they are part of the (self)controlled media network.
> 'School of assasins' pupils created enough mayhem for NYT to run nice series of front page articles.
>
>Chronicles of FB students: Coup d etat in ...
>Chronicles of FB students: Assasination of ...
>Chronicles of FB students: War in...
>
>What they reported is decline of activist movement against it. But what do you expect, they are spineless leftists anyway {g}.

So the definition of "self-censorship" is making different choices about coverage than you would make?

Actually the NYT and most major American media have run rather extensive (negative) coverage of the School of the Americas and some of it's most unsavory graduates over the years. A bit more relevant perhaps in the days of Somoza and some of the uglier Honduran thugs when it was considered important to push back hard in Latin America because some people still took Cuba seriously.

The big story is that what you consider the big story isn't considered by many The Big Story.

But hey, if the mainstream media "properly" covered things the way you thought right, you wouldn't get to feel elite, special and clever for seeing through it.

Remember, the same tight group of 100,000 conspirators that have kept the secret of 9/11 for over 9 years controls the media. Have you considered that everything you have heard about the arrests at the SOA protests would never have got out at all unless they approved it? Hmmm, wonder what their game *really* is? Are you a pawn in their game ... or one of them?