>>>>Uhm.. What a long response to a very simple question... {g}
>>>>
>>>>Well story is still unfolding. We will know all details in a few days I guess.
>>>>Meanwhile it is nice to know that there are people in US who oppose 'SOA' (stands for 'School of Assasins') practices,
>>>>and better yet that there are journalists still interested in reporting events like this. Even if it is only one International channel.
>>>>
>>>>I watched multiple videos on this event, and googled desperately on FoxNews / oRaily crew covering this event, but surprisingly did not find any! (Nor any other US media for that matter).
>>>>
>>>>How is that possible ? Are they already (God Forbid!) banned ? ;))
>>>
>>>Yeah, the New York Times hid it under
>>>
>>>
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/22/us/politics/22protest.html>>>
>>>Of course, the NYT is a samizdat and I'm sure this only got into the hands of a brave few who escaped from the jackbooted fascist government censors that control American media.
>>
>>Talking to a dinosaur...{g} Aloha Charles! Censorship nowadays is not what used to be in USSR back in 50ies...
>>
>>This article is almost off the textbook of modern media control;
>>It reports on
marginalization of mentioned protests rather then original cause for protests. Not that NYT would accept this,
>>but they are part of the (self)controlled media network.
>> 'School of assasins' pupils created enough mayhem for NYT to run nice series of front page articles.
>>
>>Chronicles of FB students: Coup d etat in ...
>>Chronicles of FB students: Assasination of ...
>>Chronicles of FB students: War in...
>>
>>What they reported is decline of activist movement against it. But what do you expect, they are spineless leftists anyway {g}.
>
>So the definition of "self-censorship" is making different choices about coverage than you would make?
No, Media Control / self censorship is choices about (non) coverage of distinct number of very important issues, and high standard of coverage for all the others (something like unwritten black list / white list).
9/11 that you mentioned is one very good example of it. Whole subject is total taboo, and whoever decides to write about
is immediately branded conspiracy nut.
(Surprise, Surprise, Guess who now all of a sudden joined 'nutcase' camp...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ryb7UOkouVA Somebody better send Murdock some honey, or he might fly himself where the good watch ratings are ... {g} )
>
>Remember, the same tight group of 100,000 conspirators that have kept the secret of 9/11 for over 9 years controls the media. Have you considered that everything you have heard about the arrests at the SOA protests would never have got out at all unless they approved it? Hmmm, wonder what their game *really* is? Are you a pawn in their game ... or one of them?
You decided to insult my intelligence again. What kind of bananas is this ??
Did I ever implied that you believe in all BS floating out there ? (Or that you are not very well aware of things I am talking about ? {g})
C'mon. Be gentlemen ;)
