Why CursorFill() is faster than CursorRefresh() in a CA? - Level Extreme

Level Extreme platform

Subscription

Corporate profile

Products & Services

Support

Legal

Français

Why CursorFill() is faster than CursorRefresh() in a CA?

Message

From

30/11/2010 14:34:55

Naomi Nosonovsky
Wisconsin, United States

To

30/11/2010 14:24:44

Emerson Reed
Folhamatic Tecnologia Em Sistemas
Americana - São Paulo, Brazil

General information

Forum:

Visual FoxPro

Category:

Databases,Tables, Views, Indexing and SQL syntax

Title:

Re: Why CursorFill() is faster than CursorRefresh() in a CA?

Environment versions

Visual FoxPro:

VFP 9

OS:

Windows 7

Miscellaneous

Thread ID:

01491162

Message ID:

01491164

Views:

58

>Why CursorFill() is faster than CursorRefresh() in a CA?
>Note that both functions returns the same number of records and uses the same SelectCmd...

I would expect CursorRefresh to be faster in a parameterized query.

If it's not broken, fix it until it is.

My Blog

Click here to load this message in the networking platform