>>Why CursorFill() is faster than CursorRefresh() in a CA?
>>Note that both functions returns the same number of records and uses the same SelectCmd...
>
>CursorFill()
>create the CA.Alias dbf
>
>CursorRefresh()
>1. create a temp dbf
>2. copy temp.dbf into the CA.Alias dbf
>
>the step 2. can require enough time,
>and this force the dbf structure to not change

Hi Fabio,

are your shure?

the DBF() is someting like SYS(2015)+'.DBF'
I can see DBF(CA.ALIAS) change with every CursorRefresh.
I run in this indexing a CA / View after Requery / CursorRefresh

Agnes