Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Why CursorFill() is faster than CursorRefresh() in a CA?
Message
De
01/12/2010 03:29:18
 
 
À
01/12/2010 03:24:26
Lutz Scheffler (En ligne)
Lutz Scheffler Software Ingenieurbüro
Dresden, Allemagne
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
Base de données, Tables, Vues, Index et syntaxe SQL
Versions des environnements
Visual FoxPro:
VFP 9
OS:
Windows 7
Divers
Thread ID:
01491162
Message ID:
01491328
Vues:
70
>>>Why CursorFill() is faster than CursorRefresh() in a CA?
>>>Note that both functions returns the same number of records and uses the same SelectCmd...
>>
>>CursorFill()
>>create the CA.Alias dbf
>>
>>CursorRefresh()
>>1. create a temp dbf
>>2. copy temp.dbf into the CA.Alias dbf
>>
>>the step 2. can require enough time,
>>and this force the dbf structure to not change
>
>Hi Fabio,
>
>are your shure?
>
>the DBF() is someting like SYS(2015)+'.DBF'
>I can see DBF(CA.ALIAS) change with every CursorRefresh.
>I run in this indexing a CA / View after Requery / CursorRefresh
>
>Agnes

try to attach the CA.alias to a Grid

a fast way is Browse it and requery()
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform