>>>>Thanks for your response, Mr. Holzer.
>>>>
>>>>Nope..no luck with IE too..do you know Eric's email?
>>>>
>>>>Thanks!
>>>
>>>Hi Steve,
>>>
>>>Tc is she :)
>>>
>>>Comparing Foxite interface and UT interface for me UT is a clear winner, but I'm used to UT. In terms of the technical discussions I think foxite is now much more oriented towards FoxPro and has a lot more discussions than UT. On the other hand, UT has more .NET discussions and some SQL Server threads as well.
>>
>>The only issue I have with UT if the filtering of the threads. I like to refer back to the OP once in a while, but with UT it is a gymnastic to get back to the original question. With Foxite it is all there. Same with Tek-Tips, all there. Also I think UT's filtering is wrong. I get on and only see things posted today (for example) but I never saw the original question, I think the filterin on UT is based on Date rather than datetime(), so I miss alot of the conversation, so I may end up posting solutions that may hav already been posted last night. Not good.
>
>You can use a time warp at the top (from the left panel) to go back. You can also use a Calendar feature. Also, for each particular thread you can use view whole thread to see the thread with all messages or view starting from particular message.
>
>In other words, there is a lot of the flexibility.

My concern is if there is a thread with two responses from yesterday and nothing today on that thread, I would not even see anything today to map to, the thread would not even be there to map from.

Time warp is fine, but if I don't think of doing it, I miss alot of thread.s Unlike all the other sites I go to, who show me everything. I guess Michel has his reason to do it this way, but it does nto seem to be because the speed access to current messages is better, at least I don't see a difference.