>>If you are OK with logging off at 10:00pm one night, and coming the next morning and missing a few threads (unless you start clicking around the whole screen as every one suggest)s? Not for me. Show me what I have read, show me what I did not read, and I'll deal with the rest. That is what cookies are for, it saves the last place I was at, and shows me the rest.
>
>I think there is a lot of misundestanding here.
>
>First of all, instead of using cookies to see your last read messages, we use your account setting. So, that is the same. When you log in, we show you whatever is new, the same thing as when you clear out your voice mail. You wouldn't want to read all previous read messages.
>
>It is however true that sometimes you could have 200 new messages but only have time to read 10 out of 20 you would like to read. For such option, we provide some tools. Time Warp is the best. Why? Because, in one simple click, you can get the simulation of your last login or last refresh for new messages. I haven't see anything like that on the net yet.
>
>Secondly, if you would really have to get all messages everytime, than, that would be close to two millions messages. I doubt this is what you would really want.
>
>But, if you have ideas to make your presence on the site more ok, let me know. I will see what can be done.

It is my misunderstanding that if I log off at 10:00pm on enight, and there are new posts after 10:00pm, and I log back in at 08:00am the next day, I would miss the posts from last night after 10:00pm unless I clicked somewhere (time warp or otherwise)?
Many times I log in and I see posts in the middle of a conversation, and I swear I never saw the original question, not yesterday nor today.