>>http://www.abc.net.au/news/events/japan-quake-2011/beforeafter.htm
>>
>>I can only assume the death toll is going to be much much higher than the 1000+ figure being quoted
>
>I don't know if anyone else watched CNN last night, but here in the U.S., late last night it switched from CNN to CNN International to continue the live coverage. I don't watch CNN International that often and last night reminded me why. The anchors were like drones... it seemed like a cheap copy of BBC news. I am surprised how different the style is between U.S. CNN and CNN International. It was great for keeping up with the live coverage, but the anchors were also great for putting you to sleep :o) Strangely, it went from one female anchor to another until they had gone through 3 -- each one more robot-like than the previous. Is there a rule for English speaking international news that the anchors must all speak in a monotone? That doesn't happen on Univision, RT, or Al Jazeera...

I never watch rolling news coverage. The endless repeating of the few facts is mind numbing, combined with the experts getting things wrong.

I saw one "expert" assure the presenter that the tidal wave travelling over the ground was travelling at 500 mph. Obviously confusing the speed in open ocean when the wave may only have a height of a couple of centimetres with the much slower speed as the wave approaches shallow water but the wave gets much higher. When I see things like that it makes me wonder about all the "experts" talking about things I don't know anything about.