>Depends on which projection you look at. Jerry Palm has the Aggies a 10 seed this morning, potentially facing Duke in the second round
>
>I realize it's speculation, but Joe Lunardi is usually pretty accurate.
>
>Putting the Aggies as a 10 seed and possibly facing Duke means that the selection team would view teams like Missouri and George Mason and Gonzaga as higher seeds than the Aggies. I rather doubt that will happen.
>
>Granted the Aggies S.O.S. is still a bit questionable, but their overall record should probably still be high enough to keep them where they are. But we'll find out in about 6 hours....
Harvard got reamed. With 68 teams in it now, a team with a record of 23-6 and an RPI of 37 belongs, especially with the ACC, Big Ten, and SEC all having down years. The selection committee is on automatic pilot.
I also have no idea how Pitt got a #1 seed with their late season slump. Maybe it's tribute to a conference that is sending 11 teams.
I am going to have fun watching it and cheering for every underdog.
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only