>>>Last time I checked this site was owned my Michel and therefor he can do whatever he wants with it.
>
>And IMHO he would be a fool to explain exactly how he identified somebody who went to great lengths to cover their tracks, or to participate any further in these discussions.
>
>As I said earlier, I feel sorry for Kevin but I'm absolutely sure that if he didn't do it, he needs to convince UT management rather than sending smoke signals via proxies here.
>
>I also have another suggestion: limit daily chatter posts to 3 for people who have not had a post marked as a technical solution by a different person in the last month. This is similar to eBay's strategy. It incentivizes contribution, prevents endless tail-chasing as we're seeing here and dis-empowers the saboteurs in the first place.

I don't see why chatter should have a limit.

Myabe you shouldn't be banned for anything that appears in chatter only for messing up technical threads.