>>I don't know, maybe for the same reason I didn't? Because I'm not Grover. Why PM when you have no association with it?

Why indeed. The problem with that position is that Michel says he is very sure he has his Grover. How do you fit this into your scenario? I had assumed that this is why people asked whether there is evidence for an additional culprit so that KG would not be blamed for the other user's posts as well as his own. If you are saying that KG is completely innocent then we are back to the problem of Michel's certainty.

Which is why I'm taking no position at all.

>>I find it amazing that you have no problem with it. Would you see it differently if it happened to you?

I'm not sure why you make either statement. As I keep saying, I'm not competent to take a position and neither are you. Of course I wish it hadn't happened, though I wasn't one of those who complained to Michel to get Grover in trouble. And I've said what I hope I would do if it happened to me.