>>I have no idea what you are talking about. Are you trying to day that these people think that Obama's policies are actually making things better for them?
You had claimed that the country could not survive another term of Obama. Compared to what? Lets talk specifics: e.g. almost 50% unemployment for the young, the worst figure since records started being kept in 1948. If the identity of the President is so important to the nation's survival, perhaps people should ask their preferred candidate whether he or she can do something about society rewarding corporates for exporting jobs to China rather than offering gainful employment to the nation's own youth so that it will not need to revolt against the Tyranny of the Snowbird. Seems to me that people are more interested in slapping out at the other side than solving real issues, in which case it won't matter who the President is when the explosion occurs.
"... They ne'er cared for us
yet: suffer us to famish, and their store-houses
crammed with grain; make edicts for usury, to
support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act
established against the rich, and provide more
piercing statutes daily, to chain up and restrain
the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and
there's all the love they bear us."
-- Shakespeare: Coriolanus, Act 1, scene 1