>>>>>>>>>>Pearl Harbor was an attack on a military complex.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Our atomic bombs killed over one hundred thousands civilians including women and children.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>It's sad you can't see the difference.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Again, attacks. If you'd like to discuss this, go right ahead, but I hold myself to a certain level of decorum and I refuse to stoop to your level. I look forward to Viv's response.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>You're funny. You sling with the best of them then pretend that you don't when the trail is here to see. Wow.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I do admit that I often resort to frustration after trying to make my point, but you default to frustration. You haven't even attempted to make one point, but expect to be taken seriously?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Really? How is this not a valid point:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Pearl Harbor was an attack on a military complex.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Our atomic bombs killed over two hundred thousands civilians including women and children.
>>>>>
>>>>>What should we have done, in your opinion? Sent in troops? Embargo?
>>>>
>>>>That's besides the point. Fact is the USA committed the largest terrorist attack in the history of earth and is still the only country to use atomic weapons against someone else.
>>>
>>>Japan was months away from completing their nuclear weapons. Do you think they would have thought twice about using them against us?
>>
>>Again, beside the point. Fact is the USA committed the largest terrorist attack in the history of earth and is still the only country to use atomic weapons against someone else.
>
>Do you apply the same logic to Afghanistan/911?

Well....sort of. It was for sure a terrorist attack, but I don't know if a government was responsible. True a government might of been responsible for allowing the terrorist to exist and did nothing about it, but I'm not sure if it was a government that green-lighted the attack - which in the case of USA/Japan there is no question.