>>>>Ignore Tore's .NET is Dead rant BTW.
>>>
>>>It was not meant as a rant, and I never said that .net is dead. I have spent the last few years monitoring what goes on in the hardware and software business, and the more I see, the more confused I get. Making a decision will always be a gamble.
>>
>>".net is a dead end."
>
>I guess I don't have to explain the difference to you. And btw, I am willing to bet that no matter what tool you pick, sooner or later it will be replaced and die a slow death.

Eventually, yes.

In another 5 or 10 years .NET may start being superceeded by something new.

Kind of like VFP 10 years ago.