>>>>>Ignore Tore's .NET is Dead rant BTW.
>>>>
>>>>It was not meant as a rant, and I never said that .net is dead. I have spent the last few years monitoring what goes on in the hardware and software business, and the more I see, the more confused I get. Making a decision will always be a gamble.
>>>
>>>".net is a dead end."
>>
>>I guess I don't have to explain the difference to you. And btw, I am willing to bet that no matter what tool you pick, sooner or later it will be replaced and die a slow death.
>
>Eventually, yes.
>
>In another 5 or 10 years .NET may start being superceeded by something new.
>
>Kind of like VFP 10 years ago.

Or Silverlight last week.