>I get your point and agree that the way LINQ is structured now is easier from VS developers point of view.
>But then why if the C# is so strict type of language we have VAR?
don't mix the "static type dynamic" with var... pretty sure that is what you really meant ;-)
I DO love typing that definition, though.
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only