>Rick was in the Tek-Tips VFP forum recently, talking about this. There's some information there.
>
>My take from his messages was that what he's interested in replicating wasn't at all the parts of VFP that matter to me, but I don't remember the particulars.
>
>Tamar

"It will offer compatibility with a DOS-based multi-user 2.1 version, along with a gui-based 2.6 version, as well as visual versions 3, 6 and 9."

What more are you looking for in VFP?
Plus, you may get a shot at salvation ;)

My feeling, here we go one more time. By now I've given up on these "promises" and moved on - C# / XAML in my case.