Not sure where most of that came from. Certainly I don't agree with slapping hate or lemming or any other labels on parents who decide not to allow their kids to participate. Perhaps parents are simply alarmed at the idea of subterfuge when it comes to their kids. After all, trying to sneak under the radar is only necessary if you're trying to get away with something. Of course this is all supposition that there was indeed a gay agenda being sneaked in behind the anti-bullying figleaf. If that's not the case then it's difficult to understand why anybody would invent such a thing. It does look as if there has been some argy-bargy between the 2 parties for a while. I also see that the promoters of the mix it up day recently threatened to sue a school for not being supportive of gay students. There may be more to this than meets the eye.

As for the rest of the labeling etc: while nobody would deny that those with gay affect may be bullied, resulting suicides and community hand-wringing more often involves heterosexual girls accused of promiscuity. Seems to me that deviating attention away from those most at risk of killing themselves and towards some other group, would need more justification than an "everybody knows" argument. JMHO.