I'm sure it does, but my point was that not having touch capability seems like giving up an important part of what makes Metro Metro. Overall I agree with Bill that it is not a good fit for the desktop. (Agreeing with Bill -- the horror, the horror! ;-) )

>Win8 is optimized for touch, but doesn't require it. I don't have touch on my laptop and Win8 works just fine.

>
>>(snip)
>>
>>Obviously I am not fully up to speed on Win8 but running Metro on a desktop doesn't even make sense to me. Isn't touch a big part of it? If I upgraded this machine to Win8 would I suddenly be able to do things by touching the monitor, dragging, growing/shrinking, etc.? One thing I love about my setup is the two large monitors and I sure don't want to run out and replace them with touch-sensitive monitors (if that's what I would need to do). Can someone please clarify this for me?