>>>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=977_1358957795
>>>
>>>Anti-Gun Idiot "The Second Amendment ... is it relevant today?"
>>
>>If you understand the original purpose of the 2nd Amendment I'm not so sure it really is relevant. An armed citizen militia is not going to protect anyone from the USA army unless they also have atomic bombs, F14's sidewinder missiles, etc etc.
>
>
>If there was one person in the USA with guns, he probably wouldn't stand a chance.
>
>Keeping in mind that many in law enforcement and the military are on the side of gun rights,

I've been wondering about that as I haven't noticed any news about how the police unions feel about gun control. I assumed that the police would be all for gun control - perhaps I'm wrong about that?

>the government couldn't possibly round up enough (armed) paramilitary troops to enter every household and take away the people's guns.

Yes that's a very good point.

>Have a very large population of armed citizens makes it in fact an impossible option for the government to take.
>
>QED.



>>>War Vet "The threat of tyranny is no less today than it was at the turn of the century or 1800 or 1700".
>>
>>Yeah I don't think that's true.
>>
>>>AMEN WELL SAID!
>>>
>>>
>>>These anti-gun nuts are EXACTLY why we need the Second Amendment!!!
>>
>>I'd say it's safe to say there are nuts on both sides. How about the bozo on FOX news that says if MLK were alive today he'd be against any type of gun control. yeah - the guy who preached love and peace and was killed by a gun would be against any type of gun control..riiiight.