General information
Category:
Coding, syntax & commands
>Jim,
>
>>From what I've tried in VFP 5.0, W95 (the data reside on a local disk,
>have not tried on the shared novell drive yet), transacation processing
>does not lock the whole table: I locked a record on station (with
>rlock()), and could update another record in the same table from within
>a transaction on another station. The transaction fails if the same
>record is updated, but that is to be expected.
>
>HTH,
>
>Marc
Marc,
Thanks much for your replies. I will give VFP 5 a try. Did your testing of transaction processing with VFP 5 include adding a new record at one station while updating a record at another station? This was the major problem I had with my application. My users will spend more time creating new records than modifying existing data.
Jim
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only