>>I completely agree with Mr. Carville.
>>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2013/06/05/carville_obamas_choice_of_susan_rice_for_national_security_adviser_an_in_your_face_appointment.html
>>
>>I also agree with Valerie Jarrett
>>http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/valerie-jarrett-eric-holder-will-be-his-position-quite-while_733906.html
>>
>>As such, the administration has essentially given the middle finger to the House Republicans. In turn I fully expect them to give it right back.
>>
>>Thus my prediction:
>>
>>Zero major legislation will be passed for the remainder of Obama's presidency and he is now officially a lame duck.
>>
>>To quantify my prediction:
>>No immigration deal
>>No tax reform
>>No Health care repeal
>>No student loan foregiveness
>>No gun control
>>
>>You get the idea.
>>
>>I love gridlock (stops "them" from taking from "us") so am actively hoping for no change. ;)
>
>I was fortunate enough to hear Carville in a debate with Karl Rove at a convention in New Orleans in April. IMO Carville wiped the floor with him. (Of course I would think that). Carville was cool, calm, and collected and Rove was uptight.
>
>The headline speaker was Bill Clinton. It was an IT health conference and he lived up to his reputation as a wonk. He knew his stuff. I don't care what you think about his politics or his philandering, he is a world class thinker. I was a little irritated at two of the guys who shared the booth with me. They are arch conservative, which is fine.

>You are arch conservative and that's OK.

You must be kidding!

>They refused to go listen to Bill Clinton speak even though it was during a noon break and it was free. To me if you have the opportunity to listen to a two term American President speak for free you take it. I would listen to George Bush even though I didn't agree with him about a thing.