>>The press and enlightened ones like you have been pushing to get god (and morality - part of the
>>foundations of scouting) out of scouts, and now are pushing to have homosexuals placed in with
>>the boys. Being competitive liberals, that of course won't be enough will it?
>>
>>The Boy Scouts as an organization is pretty much done for now because of this. Many troops have
>>folded because they lost their charters (most are chartered through churches or other non-enlightened
>>organizations). Opening the door by allowing openly homosexual scouts (kids 11-17 in an organization
>>that disallows sexual activity during scouting activities) in guarantees that within a couple of years there
>>will be many more suits as homosexuals try to get in a leaders of the boys (why?) - once that barrier
>>breaks, the Boy Scouts will cease to exist.
>
>That will be the argument used to allow gay leaders. "So, I was able to become an Eagle Scout as a gay boy, but now as an adult I cannot be a leader? How fair is that?"
>
>>Perhaps the man-boy love scouts will be the replacement?
>>Then perhaps they'll need to allow goats in so they won't feel disenfranchised.
>
>Ouch. Frightening. But you're right. The rallying cry would be that which we've already heard, "So long as I'm not hurting anyone else, where's the harm?"
>
>This is the first non-tech post you've ever written, William, that I more or less agree with from top to bottom. :-)

You haven't been paying attention, Rick. Bill has posted many non-tech messages. I happen to disagree with him across the board, but that's OK.