>>Yeah right. I'm sure things would of turned out better for everyone with your mentality behind it - we'd have three dead gunshot kids instead of one beat up kid.
>
>If you have the stones to severely beat another person, you should have the stones to face that person defending themselves.

The driver wasn't even involved in the fight - so he jumps in the middle of it and ends up shooting a teenager because now he has to defend himself? I don't see how this benefits anyone and the end result is obviously worse.