>>>Yeah right. I'm sure things would of turned out better for everyone with your mentality behind it - we'd have three dead gunshot kids instead of one beat up kid.
>>
>>If you have the stones to severely beat another person, you should have the stones to face that person defending themselves.
>
>The driver wasn't even involved in the fight - so he jumps in the middle of it and ends up shooting a teenager because now he has to defend himself? I don't see how this benefits anyone and the end result is obviously worse.

I mentioned somewhere else I don't have all the details, and I also said that a gun isn't the right tool for the job in this case. However, my statement about stones still stands.